Thought > action

04.01.2005

By now, it's hit the wire news services that a Kalamazoo community college student threw caesar salad at Pat Buchanan during his visit to WMU yesterday. Now, I don't like Pat Buchanan either. And I wholeheartedly agree that advertising his visit deliberately to coincide w/ Cesar Chavez Day was in very poor taste. That said, what that kid did was foolish, and I'm disappointed so many people think it was "cool". For several reasons.

First, the principle of free speech. I believe that all people & groups, even those we despise or vehemently disagree w/, must have their right to freely express their views w/o fear of physical retaliation protected. It's a liberal, progressive, democratic value. If we only support that value in favor of people we agree w/, then we don't really believe in free speech. I do believe it's as simple as that. There's a very, very thin line protecting civil public discourse in an open, democratic society. A counter protest is fine; shouting down the public speaker crosses the line; throwing physical items at the person goes well beyond crossing that line.

Second, it was a poor tactical mistake. The kid was arrested, but Buchanan has decided not to press charges. In short, the kid looks foolish & irresponsible; Buchanan walks away magnanimous. And that'll bolster Buchanan among some sectors of popular opinion. Why? Because once again lefties look like crazy loons, and conservatives look like patient, stately figures.

Third, I would hope there are better arguments against Buchanan's point of view than a childish temper tantrum or flinging food. Why not ask a question during the Q&A session, challenging the paleoconservative to debate issues?

Fourth, as a Hispanic/Latino immigrant, I'm tired of well-meaning white kids thinking they're standing up for me. Please don't. Cesar Chavez, Martin Luther King Jr, and other civil rights leaders had a quiet dignity about them; it wasn't about looking "cool" to their friends. It was about moving forward w/ determination to actually find a way to convince others, through morally convincing arguments & ethical purpose, to change their minds & hearts. Cesar Chavez refused to eat grapes, he didn't throw them at his opponents. Next time you wanna do something to "fight the system", I challenge you to work a shift at a soup kitchen, a homeless shelter, or read to migrant farmers' kids. It might go a lot farther (and you might actually do some good).

Fifth, back to public discourse. Those kind of tactics carry w/ them a very dark & dangerous implicit assumption behind them: Opinions different from your own can be opposed by material force, not moral weight. Cesar Chavez, MLK Jr, and others always turned the other cheek; they always sought to show that there was a higher, better path. Throwing things at public speakers is an invitation to a food fight. Next time Chomsky (or, better, Ward Churchill) speaks, maybe someone'll throw rotten eggs at him. Why not? You said it was OK.

As a liberal, I believe thought should precede action. Only one political ideology has ever taught, as its guiding principle, that action could substitute for thought. And, no, it was neither communism nor socialism.

-----
UPDATE: So the kid who did this got his name in the local newspaper. Which, I suspect, is what he really wanted. But does he realize how much of a clown he sounds like in the article? Probably not.

Posted by Miguel at 12:49 PM

Comments

I hadn't heard about it. Certainly was stupid of the huero kid.

I agree with your point of view.

Posted by: tom at April 1, 2005 01:07 PM

Good points. And another thing that kid should learn is that in this country and time period, at least all he got was fined. Had he lived in another country ot era he probably could have been shot (as you were alluding to in your closing statement).

It's kind of like if the KKK came to campus. I abhor such a group, but they have a right to be here based on our belief in free speech. Should we throw stuff at them? I know many would like to. But a better way to deal with groups/people you disagree with is to ignore them or at least figure out why they believe in opposite ideals. Since I don't care for Buchanan, I wasn't going to go watch him, fill a seat, and get pissed off. I stayed home and let my brain rot watching reality television.

Posted by: Kara at April 1, 2005 01:55 PM

Preach it brother. You don't fight ideas with salad dressing.

Posted by: John-Paul at April 1, 2005 05:39 PM

Miguel, you - a liberal? Hmmm... Oh by the way isn't throwing a salad a form of expression (of free speech)? Asking to open a debate. N.

Posted by: Nenad at April 2, 2005 08:13 AM

Yes, Nenad, I'm very much a liberal. I respect the right of unpopular people to express their opinions w/o fear of retribution, and I respect the right to private property, etc. THAT makes me a liberal. You doubt that? My position stands 100% behind the ACLU:

http://www.aclu.org/StudentsRights/StudentsRights.cfm?ID=9004&c=159

And do you really think that throwing material things at people is an expression of open debate? In a liberal society one has the right to speak, complain, argue, yell, etc. But you don't have the right to silence others. And you certainly don't have the right to damage their property or their person.

Do you really think throwing salad dressing on him was an expression of political speech? Really? Please tell me you're kidding. Next time you're on a panel, giving a talk, and someone doesn't like your research/methods/data/etc, think about what rights they have to challenge you. Does it include throwing things at you?

And did there have to be an "asking to a debate"? The kid ended a Q & A session. The kid, essentially, didn't "open" a debate, he CLOSED it!

I'm tired of people willing to defend the rights of some people to offend others, but not all the way around. I'm sick of it, actually.

Posted by: Miguel [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 2, 2005 01:00 PM

Throwing things at speakers isn't a form of political speech - it's assault and battery. It's criminal! It doesn't really respond to the ideas promoted by Buchanan - which are mostly out of wack - either.

I would petition the city of Kalamazoo to press charges against the kid. Buchanan is the complainant, and the complainant is usually a necessary to a criminal prosecution as a matter of proof. Certainly enough people saw the salad toss to testify what happened. Criminal prosecutions in theory are not brought on behalf of the victims, per se - they're instituted and prosecuted on behalf of the people of whatever jurisdiction in which the court has power.

I would argue that b/c Buchanan is a political figure, requiring his presence at trial would create undue hardship. Proof should be easy - video and eyewitness testimony.

I'd also argue that the case should not be dismissed based on the fact that Buchanan didn't want to press charges; rather, the people of the city of Kalamazoo were harmed by the kid's criminal acts: reputationally and personally (indignation and offense).

There's something wrong with a person who thinks he can throw physical objects at public figures with ideas uncompatible with his own. He ought to be given a lesson in the rule of law and civility in discourse.

Just my .02 cents.

Posted by: tom at April 2, 2005 02:39 PM

Of course I was kidding, that's why I added "Asking to open a debate." Even my first question was a wit remark. All I said, obviously in my misunderstood English, was that I agreed with you. That's all; I better stop joiking in English, I seem only to offend people, N.

Posted by: Nenad at April 2, 2005 02:49 PM

"Asking to open a debate" meant "let's discuss whether his action could be protected under the first amendment and obviously why not". N.

Posted by: Nenad at April 2, 2005 02:52 PM

Oh, sorry, Nenad. Yeah, I guess I should've known you'd be kidding. I've just been really upset about this, and the rather widespread reaction from so-called "liberals" etc. Makes me want to scream sometimes.

But I don't think this kid even vaguely comprehends the extent of idiocy he perpetrated.

Posted by: Miguel [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 2, 2005 04:01 PM