Election predictions
11.06.2005Technorati tag: Bolivia
Now that the elections are back on track, there'll soon be a new series of public pre-election polls & other coverage in Bolivian newspapers. There's also growing question of whether Evo Morales, presidential candidate for MAS, can win the presidential contest. All I can do is speculate, of course, based on month-old polling data.
Now, I think Evo might very well win the popular vote. But I can't predict a 50% victory, which is what he'd need to win the presidency outright. Right now, Evo seem's to've peeked at about 38%. The boost is due to his appearance at the Argentine Americas trade summit.
But there's negative consequences to his apperance, too. The move won't play well w/ many voters in the eastern lowlands (the "media luna" departments) that seem to prefer liberalized trade policies. And because the appearance was orchestrated by Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, Evo's opened himself up to charges that he's merely a Chavez puppet (a charge Evo tries to dismiss, often by traveling to Venezuela to "coordinate" the defensive strategy).
So looking at the last nationwide polling data, I tried some very preliminary electoral math. The method was simple: I took the percentage of votes in each department & multiplied it w/ the total number of lower house seats. Since the MMP electoral system is roughly proportional (though w/ a slight tendency to the parties w/ largest vote share). The number of seats were rounded up; this left a large chunk of seats unaccounted for. Another caveat: Since there's no polling data on Beni or Pando, I left those seats unaccounted for. But keep in mind that these will likely give MAS very few seats (perhaps 2-3), but will mostly favor Tuto Quiroga's PODEMOS. That said, here are the basic calculations I came up w/.
MAS would win: La Paz 9, Potosí 3, Oruro 3, Cochabamba 4, Chuquisaca 2, Santa Cruz 5, Tarija 1.
PODEMOS would win: La Paz 8, Potosí 4, Oruro 4, Cochabamba 6, Chuquisaca 4, Santa Cruz 7, Tarija 4.
Doria Medina's UN would win: La Paz 6, Potosí 1, Oruro 2, Cochabamba 3, Chuquisaca 2, Santa Cruz 8, Tarija 2.
That leaves a total of 28 seats unaccounted for (a total of 42 including Beni & Pando). The total seats in the lower house are 130.
The winner? PODEMOS w/ 37 seats over 27 for MAS & 24 for UN.
Of course, the large number of unaccounted-for seats means the election is still anyone's. But PODEMOS only needs another 28 seats (about two thirds of the remainder) to win an outright legislative majority. In contrast, MAS would need to win 38. This is difficult for Evo, since it would force MAS to win all the open seats in the departments listed & still pick up more than half the seats in Beni & Pando (and that's just not likely to happen). And, of course, a few seats here/there will be filled by other parties.
If MAS continues unwilling to negotiate w/ any other party, then Evo needs a majority of the lower house to win the presidency. And a solid majority at that. Because the election of president is made by a joint session of parliament (both the House of Deputies and the Senate). If Tuto wins in 4 departments and comes in second in 4 he'll have almost half the Senate. Evo can't hope for better, so he'll need a wide legislative majority.
On the other hand, if Tuto has a large seat share, it'll be easy for him to close the gap w/ a PODEMOS-UN alliance.
Of course, all of this is up in the air. Who knows what the election will bring, or what new developments will evolve. So take all this w/ a very large grain of salt.
Posted by Miguel at 01:32 PM
Comments
If you ask me, I am fearing an alliance MAS-UN. Doria Medina has been holding talks with some MAS senators and deputies. He's also been coming closer and closer to Evo's position. Granted that Tuto has also turned to populist policies, but it seems to me Doria Medina is seriously considering an alliance with MAS, since this would consolidate his party in the minds of a large proportion of voters who are really sick of the traditional parties.
Were this the case, this would spell the doom of the traditional parties as we know them in Bolivia.
Posted by: MABB at November 6, 2005 04:36 PM
Why fear an alliance like that? That would be the best case scenario for Bolivia. Now the question is what would SDM want in exchange for an alliance? I don't think he would be satisfied with a boost in his popularity and a change of perception.
I wouldn't mind seeing the end of "traditional" parties which has been a large part of putting Bolivia in the situation it is in (i.e. mega-coalitions and the patronage that goes along with that). Although I am sure MAS would operate like a political party, taking full advantage of all the benefits that goes along with an administration, such as rewarding loyalists.
Posted by: eduardo at November 7, 2005 08:49 AM
Well I just meant, I guess, fear that Evo will become the next President of Bolivia. If they form an alliance, it would be a done deal.
Posted by: Miguel (MABB) at November 7, 2005 11:55 AM
Miguel,
I thought your predictions were very interesting. And I was wondering if I could convince you to fill in the gap created by the omission of beni and pando. Perhaps with more up to date info & polls, (that have begun circulating once more, due to the fact that elections on December 18th are a certainty), might proove especially enlightning, since apparently Bolivian news agencies and political analysts alike have seem cautious in giving out such clear predictions.
Thanx and kudos for the predictions,
Daniel
Posted by: Daniel A. at November 9, 2005 02:59 PM
Daniel, I would be hard-pressed to fill in the gaps for Beni & Pando w/o any survey data. But based on historical voting tendencies in those departments (almost a two-party MNR-ADN system through 2002), I'm certain that Tuto would probably win at least half of each department's seats. That's 5 from Beni, 3 from Pando, for a total of 8 (not to mention 4 total senate seats, 2 from each department). In contrast, I don't expect Evo to win more than 1 Pando & 2 Beni seats, for a total of 3
If that's the case, then Tuto would be short only another 20 (not 28) seats from the up-for-grab category nationally to win a simple majority in the lower house. In contrast, Evo would still need 35 of the up-for-grab lower house seats to win a simple majority in the lower house.
Posted by: mcentellas at November 9, 2005 05:43 PM